tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5797187.post3392757362380386596..comments2009-09-27T16:15:04.563+02:00Christof Damianhttps://profiles.google.com/110460361414656749360noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5797187.post-66739882777129807972009-09-27T16:15:04.563+02:002009-09-27T16:15:04.563+02:00Once I got more traces in I will also work on the quality of the tags. I have to find out how other people track footways, tracks and singletracks first though.<br /><br />On the other hand: I noticed some roads being tagged as secondary when to me they are clearly tertiary. They didn&#39;t even have two lanes. The traces themselves where good though.cdamianhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01602827735606341943noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5797187.post-28076642035036402722009-09-27T14:28:54.509+02:002009-09-27T14:28:54.509+02:00You&#39;re right, choosing the right tag is not as important as getting a good GPS trace. The tags can always be changed later, but each new GPS trace adds extra value. Actually visiting, making a GPS trace and recording what is actually there, maybe with photos, notes or an audio or video recording is so much more valuable than just tracing from allowable aerial photos or importing from most PD sources.Chris Hillhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02951528269028953589noreply@blogger.com